皇冠开户
热门标签

USDT交易所程序出租:Questions of law over MACC probe into judge Nazlan to be referred to apex bench, rules High Court

时间:2周前   阅读:1   评论:1

USDT交易所程序出租点击联系我),全球頂尖的USDT場外擔保交易平臺程序出租。

The questions of law filed by two lawyers and an activist regarding the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's investigation into judge Mohd Nazlan Ghazali have been ruled by the Kuala Lumpur High Court as eligible to be referred to the Federal Court. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, July 19, 2022.

THE Kuala Lumpur High Court today granted an application by two lawyers and an activist to refer two questions of law, regarding the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) investigation into Court of Appeal judge Mohd Nazlan Ghazali, to the Federal Court. 

The two questions are on whether criminal investigation bodies including the MACC are only legally permitted to investigate High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court judges who have been suspended under Article 125(5) of the Federal Constitution, and whether the public prosecutor is empowered to institute or conduct any proceedings for an offence against serving judges pursuant to Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution.

Judge Noorin Badaruddin ruled that the Federal Court is the correct and appropriate forum to hear matters that affect the judiciary as a whole, as the question arising in this matter relates to provisions of the Federal Constitution concerning the independence of the judiciary vis-a-vis the doctrine of separation of powers.

“It is apparent that the investigation by the MACC on a serving judge of the superior court is viewed by the applicants and undeniably by many quarters of the public as an encroachment of the separation of powers. The investigation is reasonably viewed as having given rise to the impression that the judiciary is under attack, which has a bearing on public perception and confidence in the judiciary.

,

彩客网www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。彩客网上彩客分析专家数据更新最快。彩客网开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

,

“As the present matter is going on, this court takes cognisance of the fact as to the difference of opinions and views given on this issue, and this court cannot disagree that this is a matter of fundamental importance because it affects the judiciary as a whole. All these underscore the urgency of the matter.

“It cannot be denied that this court is empowered to determine the questions, but it becomes a question of concern of having to go through the appellate process on a matter that is important to the judiciary as a whole,” she said.

The judge said a definitive and final pronouncement by the Federal Court as the highest court in the land on questions arising herein that have a direct bearing on public confidence on the independence of the judiciary is therefore essential.

“The court is of the considered view that a definitive and final pronouncement by the Federal Court on the questions posed by the applicants will benefit both parties with a speedy and economic final determination of the proceedings. Thus, the application is allowed with no order as to costs,” she said before fixing October 19 for further case management.

上一篇:彩客网:俄媒:欧盟批准援助2.25亿欧元收购俄气德国子公司

下一篇:皇冠网址:U.S. job growth beats expectations; unemployment rate fall 3.5%

网友评论

  • 2022-11-14 00:01:06

    毛尖:会啊。有一次在扬州,也不是苍蝇馆子,就是门面不大的小店,也干干净净。走着走着饿了,就和朋友们一起就近吃。小店没有长餐单可选,但红烧鱼杂端上来,大鱼小鱼、大虾小虾一锅煮,一点辣、十分鲜,秋天的傍晚,还有什么比说不出名字的鱼虾更让人觉得不枉此生呢?这个肯定能出名